Author Govert SchullerPosted on Categories Parapolitics In less time than the duration between American Airline Flight 11 crashing into World Trade Center One on September 11, 2001, and its total collapse 102 minutes later, one can experience the controlled demolition of the official version presented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of how the collapse allegedly happened through a combination of structural damage and fire-induced failure. By placing scientific facts at the many weak points of the NIST structure a group of experts representing the more than 2,300 professional members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth effectively demolished the NIST report and send its authors back to engineering school.
In their recently published booklet, “Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says about the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7“, the authors make the case that the NIST hypothesis was grossly under-developed because a) it only speculates about how the collapse could have been initiated, but gives no analysis whatsoever of the building’s behavior during its destruction; b) it ignores recordings and eyewitness accounts of explosions while also misrepresenting the occurrence of molten steel and smoke puffs occurring before and below the cascading collapse, all indicating the possibility of controlled demolition; and c) NIST’s inadequate responses to “Requests for Correction” by critical experts pointing to serious flaws.
While the NIST study admits it cannot provide a full explanation of the collapse, the A&E report makes a strong case that “the hypothesis of controlled demolition readily, simply, and completely explains all of the evidence regarding the structural behavior of WTC 1 and WTC 2 during their destruction” (p. 23). The evidence discussed ranges from the statistical improbability of total collapse of high-rise steel buildings; the sudden onset of the collapse; the constant acceleration of their fall as if nothing existed below to slow the cascade; the enormous energy needed for the pulverization, dismemberment, and explosive ejection of materials; the occurrence of demolition squibs; and the eyewitness accounts of explosions.
On top of that the A&E report also presents the forensic evidence of “high-temperature thermitic reactions” before, during and after the destruction of the buildings (pp. 30-37). Molten metal was seen pouring out of WTC 2 and was found in the debris; the few samples of steel investigated had sulfidated; four samples of WTC dust contained spherules and other composite particles indicating temperatures much higher (2,800F) than officially acknowledged (1,000F); and the smoking gun was the discovery of unreacted nano-thermite in the dust samples. Note well that this last finding means that traces of explosives were found which had not yet detonated!
While overall the main stream media and many technical journals ignore these findings, it is obviously up to civic society, comprised of grass-root organizations and activist individuals, to present truth to power and fight the good political fight to get the real culprits of 9/11 apprehended. I invite you to click on the booklet and spend $2.50 [as of 12/20/15 the booklet is free] and 100 minutes to see why.
Adding to the truth of what was stated above, there’s also the consideration that the controlled demolition was enhanced,
and perhaps actually triggered, by “DEW”s, or, “directed energy weapons”. Nobody with 1/2 a brain believes the lies of the official 9/11 Commission report, anyway….