Following is a skeletal presentation of some research done
on the dynamics of the coming and going of messengers and
its interaction with the organizations founded to carry
their message. It is offered to augment awareness about
our common historical roots and to give a sense of co-measurement
with C.U.T.'s predecessors. If any practical wisdom could
be extracted from these dry facts and observations, it would
have served its purpose.
I.
|
|
|
A)
|
Theosophical Society (steady
growth till the Krishnamurti debacle [ca. 44,000 members
in 1929])
|
|
|
Its messengers:
|
|
|
1)
|
Blavatsky (followed by Annie Besant. William Q. Judge
splits off)
|
|
|
2)
|
Annie Besant (followed by Charles W. Leadbeater.
Rudolph Steiner splits off)
|
|
|
3)
|
Leadbeater (followed by Krishnamurti, who goes independent)
|
|
|
4)
|
Krishnamurti (technically speaking K was not a messenger
within the TS, but within his own Order of the Star)
|
|
|
5)
|
Cyril Scott, David Anrias, Jinarajadasa and Geoffrey
Hodson (All more or less in private capacity)
|
|
B)
|
I AM Movement (Growth till the death of Ballard
[unknown amount of members])
|
|
|
1)
|
Guy Ballard (followed by Edna Ballard)
|
|
|
2)
|
Edna Ballard (followed by nobody. Geraldine Innocente
and Frances Ekey split off)
|
|
C)
|
Bridge to Freedom (growth until the Prophet/Ekey
split off [ca. 1800 members in 1961])
|
|
|
1)
|
Geraldine Innocente (followed by Lucy Littlejohn.
Mark Prophet and Francis Ekey split off, A.D. Luk
goes independent)
|
|
|
2)
|
Lucy Littlejohn (followed by group channeling. Peter
Lewis splits off)
|
|
D)
|
The Summit Lighthouse (growth till the 'shelter
cycle' [ca. 5,000 dues paying KOF units in 1995])
|
|
|
1)
|
Mark Prophet (followed by Elizabeth Clare Prophet)
|
|
|
2)
|
Elizabeth Clare Prophet (followed
by nobody so far. Monroe and Carolyn Shearer split
off, [as do Marsha Covington and David Lewis])
|
|
|
|
|
II)
|
|
|
Theosophical Society
|
|
1851:
|
El Morya contacts Helena Petrovna
Blavatsky (HPB)
|
|
1874:
|
HPB meets Henry Steel Olcott (HSO)
|
|
1875:
|
HPB, HSO and William Quan Judge
found the Theosophical Society (TS)
|
|
1882:
|
Annie Besant (AB) converts to Theosophy
|
|
188?:
|
Charles Webster Leadbeater (CWL)
corresponds with Kuthumi and converts to Theosophy
|
|
1891:
|
HPB makes transition
|
|
1891:
|
AB, Judge and Olcott lead the TS
|
|
1895:
|
Judge splits off with the American
Section of the TS
|
|
1906:
|
CWL resigns from the TS
|
|
1907:
|
Olcott makes transition
|
|
1907:
|
AB undisputed leader of the TS
|
|
1908:
|
AB reinstates CWL. Many members
resign
|
|
1909:
|
CWL finds Krishnamurti
|
|
1911:
|
Founding by AB and CWL of the Order
of the Star in the East around Krishnamurti
|
|
1913:
|
TS-member Steiner splits off with
the German Section of the TS
|
|
1910s:
|
AB dedicates her energy to Indian
independence. CWL becomes more and more channel between
the Masters and the TS.
|
|
1923:
|
Steiner makes transition
|
|
1925:
|
K overshadowed by Maitreya
|
|
1929:
|
K dissolves the Order of the Star,
goes his own way
|
|
1933:
|
AB makes transition
|
|
1934:
|
CWL makes transition
|
|
1986:
|
K makes transition
|
|
|
|
|
I AM Activity
|
|
1930:
|
Saint Germain contacts Guy Ballard
|
|
1934:
|
Start of the I AM Activity
|
|
1939:
|
Guy Ballard makes transition
|
|
1940:
|
Guy Ballard's wife Edna Ballard
indicted for mail fraud
|
|
1943:
|
Edna starts giving dictations
|
|
1952:
|
I AM-members Geraldine Innocente
and Frances Ekey split off from the I AM Activity
|
|
1971:
|
Edna makes transition
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge to Freedom:
|
|
1944:
|
El Morya and Maha Chohan start working
with Geraldine Innocente
|
|
1952:
|
I AM-members Geraldine and Frances
Ekey split off from the I AM Activity
|
|
1952:
|
First issue of the Bridge to Freedom
Journal
|
|
1958:
|
Bridge-members Mark Prophet with
Frances Ekey split off from the Bridge and found the
Lighthouse of Freedom
|
|
1961:
|
Geraldine makes transition. Geraldine
is followed by Lucy Littlejohn.
|
|
1980:
|
Bridge-member Peter Lewis splits
off from the Bridge and starts Foundation of Higher
Spiritual Learning
|
|
|
|
|
The Summit Lighthouse
|
|
1952:
|
El Morya contacts Mark Prophet
|
|
1958:
|
Bridge-members Mark Prophet with
Frances Ekey split off from the Bridge and found the
Lighthouse of Freedom
|
|
1958:
|
Founding of The Summit Lighthouse
(TSL)
|
|
1959:
|
TSL-member Frances Ekey splits of
from TSL and continues the Lighthouse to Freedom
|
|
1961:
|
El Morya contacts Elizabeth Clare
Prophet (ECP) and sends her to Mark
|
|
1968:
|
Ekey makes transition
|
|
1971(?):
|
Annette Schroeder splits off from
TSL and starts the Ascended Master Teaching Foundation
|
|
1973:
|
Mark Prophet makes transition
|
|
1973:
|
ECP leader of TSL
|
|
1975:
|
ECP starts Church Universal and
Triumphant (CUT)
|
|
1990:
|
The 'Shelter Cycle'
|
|
1990s:
|
CUT-member and ECP's daughter Erin
Prophet trains for messenger and later distances herself
from CUT
|
|
1995:
|
Ex-CUT members Caroline and Monroe
Shearer start the Temple of the Presence (TOP)
|
|
1999: |
ECP retires |
|
2002: |
Ex-CUT member Kim Michaels
starts Ask the Real Jesus and Ex-CUT member Lorraine
Michaels starts Shangra-la |
|
2003: |
Ex-CUT member Marsha Covington
starts New Wisdom University (NWU) |
|
2005:
|
Ex-CUT member David Lewis starts
The Hearts Center
|
|
|
|
III)
|
|
|
About membership crises:
|
|
-
|
Membership crises in TS and I AM, because K and Ballard
respectively didn't fit expectations. K repudiates
TS's concept of World Teacher and Ballard dies without
physically ascending as expected.
|
|
-
|
Membership crises in I AM and CUT, because of negative
press. I AM was indicted for mail fraud and CUT's
shelter cycle started a period of intense press scrutiny,
intensified by ex-members and the medium of the internet.
|
|
-
|
Membership crises in Bridge and CUT, because of diminished
capacity of the messenger. Geraldine suffering from
psychological problems and ECP having Altzheimers
disease.
|
|
-
|
Membership problems in TS and I AM, because of dramatically
changed economic and political situation. After K's
resignation the worldwide economic depression had
a negative impact on TS-membership and W.W.II might
have had a negative impact on I AM-membership.
|
|
-
|
Membership problems in all organizations,
because members change allegiance to competitive successor
organizations. The TS lost members to the Judge and
Steiner split off, though re-established their position
in the USA, but not in Germany. The TS lost members
to Krishnamurti, though many stayed on as TS-member.
Because Ballard started independent from the TS it
is hard to get a sense about TS-members joining the
I AM. In the 1950s many, if not most, of the Bridge-members
came from the I AM, and later the Bridge lost many
members to TSL. How big the drain from CUT to TOP
[and NWU and The Hearts Center] will be is hard to
say, but might become substantial.
|
|
-
|
Membership decline in all 4 organizations seems not
to have been always caused by the absence of a messenger.
Only the TS and I AM declined after K resigned and
Ballard made his transition. In both cases though,
there were still other messengers around to fill the
void. The TS had still clairvoyants CWL and Geoffrey
Hodson (and to a certain extent Cyril Scott and David
Anrias) and the I AM had Edna and her son Donald as
messengers. This did not prevent a further decline,
though other factors became also active as threats
to the organizations. The TS had to deal with the
1930s economic depression and the I AM with negative
press, a law suit and W.W.II. The Bridge apparently
declined after a crisis in 1958, three years before
Geraldine made her transition, and CUT declined during
and because of the 'shelter cycle,' many years before
ECP's retirement.
|
|
|
|
What if?
|
|
-
|
The fate of these organizations
might have been different if they would have established
a positive and constructive relationship with their
genuine successor organizations. The main problems
being a) the difficulty to evaluate the genuineness
of a new organization, b) a blind spot in messengers
to recognize their real colleagues, and c) organizational
inertia to incorporate and act upon such an idea.
The Bridge made some attempts in trying to ally itself
with the TS, the I AM, Christian Science and some
Rosicrucian groups, but to no avail, and TOP [and
David Lewis] made overtures to CUT, but were rejected.
|
|
|
|
Larger picture:
|
|
-
|
From an esoteric-historical point of view a part
of the larger picture is the idea that the lightbearers
are still recuperating from the failed World Teacher
project with Krishnamurti and the TS. The period of
1925 until 1929 might have been the pinnacle of social,
cultural, intellectual and spiritual influence an
Ascended Master activity has ever attained. This was
followed by the greatest misery humanity had to endure
in the 1929-1945 period. As I stated in "The
Masters and Their Emissaries: From HPB to Guru Ma,"
there was a spiritual-causal connection between the
failure of the World Teacher Project and the Depression
and W.W.II.
|
|
|
|
Long-term challenges:
|
|
-
|
The long-term challenges the lightbearers are facing
might well be
a) |
the understanding and the psychological-spiritual
processing of the above mentioned traumatic
event; |
b) |
understanding the pervasive influence
Krishnamurti's teachings have on present day
spiritual and cultural circles in the sense
that it fosters skepticism about spiritual organizations
and practices; |
c) |
developing counter-strategies
by presenting the teachings in a way which will
appeal to today's sensitivities of our target
market, the cultural creatives. |
|
|
|
|
|
More background:
|
|
-
|
Just updated "The Masters
and Their Emissaries: From HPB to Guru Ma and Beyond."
|
|
-
|
See also: A
History of Ascended Master Activities (A
condensed historical paper by Allen Buresz similar
to "The Masters and Their Emissaries")
|
|
|
|
|
Some challenging reflections:
|
|
-
|
For an in-depth discussion of the
many issues involved in organizations with messengers
read J.J. van der Leeuw's "Revelation
or Realization: The Conflict in Theosophy,"
which text is now available at Alpheus. Though the
author recognizes the natural tension which exists
between Revelation (through others) and (Self-) Realization,
he presents it too much as a dualism, and, instead
of finding a middle way, chooses for Realization,
while condemning Revelation. Even so, one can respect
his position and still derive great profit from his
ponderings.
|
|