|
Introduction
"... the U.S. government will never disclose the
full truth of 9/11, until the people force it."
============================================
Five Years After and We Still Don't Know
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Source: VDARE.com, September 06, 2006
URL: http://www.vdare.com/roberts/060906_war.htm
Excerpt: The scientists, engineers, and professors who
pose the tough questions about 9/11 are not people who spend
their lives making sense of their experience by constructing
conspiracy theories. Scientists and scholars look to facts
and evidence. They are concerned with the paucity of evidence
in behalf of the official explanation. They stress that
the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws
of physics, and that the numerous security failures, when
combined together, are a statistical improbability.
============================================
What is your 'Hop' Level"
Author: Nicholas Levis
Source: Summer of Truth
URL: http://summeroftruth.org/lihopmihopnohop.html
Excerpt: We need to establish genuine peer review and a
common data base, and kill off some of the more persistent
errors that still crop up. (Minor examples: The Magic Passport
allegedly belonged to Satam Suqami, not Mohamed Atta. Tom
Kenney's FEMA team, firefighters from Massachussetts, were
sent to New York on Tuesday, not "Monday" (Sept.
10) as he misspoke on CBS.) And we must, obviously, keep
fighting for genuine independent investigation and disclosure
- even as we work on larger political strategies to deal
with the reality that the U.S. government will never disclose
the full truth of 9/11, until the people force it.
============================================
Distinguished University of Minnesota Philosophy Professor
Joins 9/11 Fight, Saying the Truth Must Be Uncovered
Author: Greg Szymanski
Source: the Looking Glass News, taken from The Arctic Beacon,
16 Dec 2005
URL: http://www.lookingglassnews.org/
viewstory.php?storyid=4084
Excerpt: As expected, a philosophy professor digs deep
into the heart of the matter, dissecting words and meanings.
Before talking about specific evidence, Fetzer provides
this illuminating discussion on "conspiracy theories,"
relating to 9/11 in a recent paper he wrote called "Thinking
About Conspiracy Theories: 9/11 and JFK."
….
After setting the record straight on conspiracy theories,
Fetzer in his paper delves into an analysis of the 9/11
evidence, saying that the controlled demolition of the WTC
must be taken seriously.
….
Besides the WTC, Fetzer also provides a detailed analysis
of the Pentagon crash, questioning as many before him, "What
Really Happened?"
============================================
"Able Danger" & 9/11 Foreknowledge
Author: William F. Jasper
Source: The New American, October 31, 2005
URL: http://911citizenswatch.org/?p=688
Excerpt: Over the past several years, as more and more
evidence has come out, it has grown more and more difficult
for U.S. government officials to sustain the cover story
that they had no way of anticipating the attacks. As it
turns out, U.S. intelligence agencies and their foreign
counterparts were almost tripping over each other as they
shadowed the al-Qaeda network across the face of the planet.
The FBI and CIA were tracking al-Qaeda operatives and their
activities in the U.S. and overseas. The National Security
Agency (NSA) was intercepting and recording the telephone
calls of many al-Qaeda operatives, including Osama bin Laden
himself. More recently, it has come to light that a super-secret
Pentagon operation, known as "Able Danger," was
also tracking and monitoring al-Qaeda. Using advanced computer
"data mining" capabilities, the Able Danger team
reportedly identified Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Khalid
al-Midhar, and Nawaf al-Hazmi as members of an al-Qaeda
cell code-named "Brooklyn" because of its connections
to New York City.
============================================
The 9/11 Commission: A Play on Nothing in Three Acts
Author: Sibel Edmonds & Bill Weaver
Source: CommonDreams.org, Tuesday, September 5, 2006
URL: http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0905-25.htm
Excerpt: The Commission was created and put in place due
to the relentless pressure and outcry by the 9/11 family
members and their public supporters who had three objectives
in mind: 1) Getting all the facts; 2) Establishing Accountability
for those who failed us due to their intentional or unintentional
acts; 3) Provide recommendation for real fixes and meaningful
remedies.
The Commission fulfilled none of those three objectives.
In their responsibility to report all the facts: They either
refused to interview all relevant experts and witnesses,
or, they censored the reports provided to them by those
with direct and first-hand information. Both these acts
were selective and intentional. Contrary to their pledge
to establish accountability: They refused to hold anyone
accountable and lamely justified it by saying, "We
don't want to point a finger at anyone."
============================================
Cover-up and conspiracy: The Bush administration and
September 11
Author: The Editorial Board
Source: World Socialist Web Site, 18 May 2002
URL: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/
may2002/bush-m18.shtml
Excerpt: Far more plausible than the strained attempts
to explain this as a "failure to connect the dots,"
is the likelihood that a decision had been made, at high
levels within the American state, to allow an Al Qaeda hijacking
to take place, in order to provide the occasion for unleashing
the military onslaught that was already in advanced stages
of planning. … Anyone who considers it unthinkable
that a US government would condone the slaughter of its
own citizens underestimates both the ruthlessness of American
imperialism and criminality of the Bush administration.
It would not be the first time a bourgeois government, bedeviled
by contradictions and crisis at home and abroad, sought
to extricate itself by creating a pretext for military action,
hoping to grab resources and strategic advantage overseas
and whip up a patriotic consensus domestically.
============================================
9/11 Special - Dutch Television Documentary
Author: n.a.
Source: TROS and AVRO (Dutch mainstream broadcasting organizations)
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MYCl9L3aVM
Excerpt: "Was 9/11 more than just an attack? Could
the Bush administration have had anything to gain from the
attack? Two prominent European politicians, Michael Meacher
and Andreas von Bülow, express their serious doubts
about the official version of the 9/11 story."
============================================
Thinking about "Conspiracy Theories": 9/11
and JFK
Author: James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Source: Scholars for 9/11 Truth
URL: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm
Excerpt: The fact that the government's "conspiracy
theory" cannot be sustained needs to be widely disseminated
to the American people. Not all "theories" are
mere guesses and many of them are empirically testable.
In this case, elementary considerations have proven that
one "conspiracy theory" is false (indeed, as we
have discovered, it cannot possibly be true), while the
alternative appears to be true (on the basis of measures
of probability and likelihood). Since the (h1) alternative
to (h2) is unreasonable and no other alternative appears
remotely plausible, the demolition hypothesis (h2) has actually
been established beyond a reasonable doubt. That, I believe,
is something that the American people need to understand.
With only slight exaggeration, this government makes a practice
of lying to us all the time. It has lied about tax cuts,
minimized the threat of global warming, offered a series
of lies about the reasons for going to war in Iraq, and
on dozens of other major issues. Some lies are bigger than
others. This one-about the causes and the effects of 9/11-counts
as a monstrosity!
============================================
Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse
of the World Trade Center
Author: Dave Heller
Source: Garlic & Grass: A Grassroots Journal of America's
Political Soul, Issue no. 6, Summer 2004, "Celsius
9-11"
URL: http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/Dave_Heller.cfm
Excerpt: There is a method that has been able to consistently
get skyscrapers to fall as fast as the three buildings of
the World Trade Center fell on 9-11. In this method, each
floor of a building is destroyed at just the moment the
floor above is about to strike it. Thus, the floors fall
simultaneously - and in virtual freefall. This method, when
precisely used, has indeed given near-freefall speed to
demolitions of buildings all over the world in the past
few decades. This method could have brought down WTC7 in
6.5 seconds. This method is called controlled demolition.
============================================
Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?
Author: Morgan Reynolds
Source: LewRockwell.com, June 9, 2005
URL: http://911review.org/news/Professor_reynolds_tower_collpase_why.html
Excerpt: It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific
debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers
and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses
is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such
erroneous engineering analysis is not likely prove to be
sound. Revised engineering and construction practices, for
example, based on the belief that the twin towers collapsed
through airplane damage and subsequent fires is premature,
to say the least. More importantly, momentous political
and social consequences would follow if impartial observers
concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. If demolition
destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center
on 9/11, then the case for an "inside job" and
a government attack on America would be compelling. Meanwhile,
the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers
everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis
of 9/11 right, "though heaven should fall." Unfortunately,
getting it right in today's "security state" demands
daring because explosives and structural experts have been
intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of 9/11.
============================================
9/11: Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration
(Chapter 10 of "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions
& Distortions")
Author: Dr. David Ray Griffin
Source: 911Truth.org December 2, 2005
URL: http://www.911truth.org/
article.php?story=20051112152750305
Excerpt: Besides omitting the Bush administration's reference
to the 9/11 attacks as "opportunities," it omitted
any discussion of the US Space Command, with its mission
to solidify global dominance, and of the PNAC document,
with its suggestion that a new Pearl Harbor would be helpful.
It omitted historical facts showing that the Bush administration
had plans to attack both Afghanistan and Iraq before 9/11,
so that the attacks served as a pretext rather than a cause.
And the Commission distorted US motives in those attacks,
portraying US leaders as interested only in self-defense,
human rights, and peace, not oil, bases, and geopolitical
primacy.
============================================
Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders State 9/11
Possibly an Inside Job
Author: Fred Burks
Source: WantToKnow.info
URL: http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
Excerpt: Each of these prominent leaders now claims that
there are serious problems with the official government
story of 9/11. Some of these highly respected individuals
even believe that 9/11 may have been an inside job. It can
be very uncomfortable to even consider the possibility that
certain individuals within government were involved either
in allowing the attacks to happen, or in some way facilitating
them in order to forward their hidden agendas. Yet the facts
increasingly point in that direction.
============================================
Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers
in the 9/11 Oral Histories
Author: David Ray Griffin
Source: 911truth.org
URL: http://www.911truth.org/
article.php?story=20060118104223192
Excerpt: Once the content of these testimonies is examined,
it is easy to see why persons concerned to protect the official
story about 9/11 would try to keep them hidden. By suggesting
that explosions were occurring in the World Trade Center's
Twin Towers, they pose a challenge to the official account
of 9/11, according to which the towers were caused to collapse
solely by the impact of the airplanes and the resulting
fires.
In any case, now that the oral histories have finally been
released, it is time for Americans and the world in general
to see what these brave men and women reported about that
fateful day. If this information forces a reevaluation of
the official story about 9/11, better now than later.
============================================
911 - A Modern Fairy Tale
Author: By Douglas Herman
Source: Rense.com, 9-6-6
URL: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/september-11-2001/2006/09/07/911-general-discussion.php
Excerpt: Call it a modern mission impossible. 19 flight
school dropouts who couldn't control a Cessna had destroyed
seven heavily-insured steel skyscrapers and the recently
remodeled wing of the Pentagon, while outwitting airport
security, smashing CIA and SEC headquarteras in a 47-story
New York skyscraper they hadn't even hit, while devising
a brand new scientific "pancake" theory. All while
remaining alive and forcing the entire US population to
live in terror, utterly taxed for the unforeseeable future,
to pay for the trillions in new war toys and security measures,
in a fruitless manhunt to find the alleged mastermind.
============================================
The Israeli Art Students And Movers Story
Author: Wayne Madsen
Source: Wayne Madsen Report
URL: http://911review.org/brad.com/
ISRAELI_ART_STUDENTS.html
Excerpt: Two internal U.S. government documents revealed
that among the 120 Israeli "art students" who
attempted to penetrate the security of dozens of Federal
office buildings and who visited the homes of scores of
U.S. law enforcement personnel during 2000 and 2001 were
some who used addresses and mail drops in southern Florida
and Texas near those used by a number of the 911 hijackers.
The information came from a Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) Report drafted in June 2001 on the activities of the
art students and a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
list of the hijackers and other terrorist suspects, accidentally
released in early October 2001 on a Finnish government web
site. The DEA memo specifically stated that the Israelis
may have had ties to an "Islamic fundamentalist group."
============================================
The German Intelligence Report
Author: n.a.
Source: Physics 911
URL: http://www.physics911.net/germanintel.htm
Excerpt: Despite angry denunciations of the authenticity
of the report from various quarters, the German government
has to the best of our knowledge not issued a denial of
its authenticity. Even if it were to do so, the alleged
urgent request for secrecy could provide grounds for such
a denial. No other effective refutation of the accuracy
of the report has been seen by the editors of this website.
Consequently, it is presented for what it is worth as a
possibly genuine document of immense historical significance.
============================================
Hintergrundbericht zum 11.9.2001 (Background Report
on 9/11/2001)
Author: Unknown
Source: BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst; German foreign secret
service), April 5, 2002. (The document was obtained by the
Iranian Foreign Ministry, which released it on August 8,
2002)
URL: http://www.physics911.net/pdf/strenggeheim.pdf
(German original); http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a652.htm
(English translation)
Excerpt: It is very evident from surveillance conducted
against Mossad agents in the Federal Republic as well as
interceptions of Israeli diplomatic communication from the
Federal Republic to Tel Aviv, that the Mossad had successfully
penetrated various extremist Arab groups in both the Federal
Republic and the United States.
These investigations disclosed in late May of 2001 that
an attack was to be made against certain specified targets
in the American cities of Washington and New York. But it
was apparent that the Mossad was not only fully aware of
these attacks well in advance but actually, through their
own agents inside the Arab groups, assisted in the planning
and the eventual execution of the attacks.
That the Israeli government was fully aware of these attacks
is absolutely certain and proven. Diplomatic traffic between
the Israeli Embassy in the Federal Republic and the Israeli
Foreign Office made it very clear that Minister President
Sharon was fully aware of this pending attack and urgently
wished that no attempt was made to prevent the attacks.
Although the Israeli officials were instructed to warn the
American intelligence community that some kind of an attack
might be possible, at no time were the specific dates and
targets (known at that time to Israeli officials) to be
given to the Americans.
|
