Formulations of the Three-Point Policy Proposal for Monetary Reform

Introduction.

Modern monetary reform aims at three inter-connected changes of the monetary system, which unity is essential and therefore for many non-negotiable.

This is a compilation of different formulations of essentially the same three points. Most formulations are intentionally triple-pointed and some are differently constructed even while more or less covering the same proposals. This list is of course not exhaustive and is meant to function as a very loose template for monetary reformers to pick and choose terms, formulations and sources they would be most comfortable with.

A. Short formulation on AMI-Facebook (here)

B. 32-Page AMI brochure “Presenting the American Monetary Act” (here)

C. Distelhorst’s Speech Template for Citizens Speaking on Monetary Reform (here)

D. Nick Egnatz’ article “Linking Social Justice to Monetary Reform” (here)

E. The “Greening of the Dollar” by the Green Party USA  (here)

F. As formulated by the Chicago Teachers Union (here)

G. As found on site of Bryan Witt (here)

H. Covered in six points by Rev. Delman Coates (here)

I. As formulated by Robert Poteat (here)

J. As formulated on Ulrich Kortsch’s Real Money Economics web site (here)

K. In “One Page Summary of What Hr 2990 Will Do” (here)

L. In AMI’s “The Need for Monetary Reform” (here)

M. In Dr. Lucille Eckrich’s  “Monetary Transformation and Education” (here)

N. In the “Manifesto” of the International Movement for Monetary Reform (here)

O. In Dr. Huber’s presentation “It’s a Banks’ World” (here)

P. In Jacques Jaikaran’s  1992 book Debt Virus (here)

Q. In the 2012 National Emergency Employment Defense Act (here)

R. In James Robertson’s  2012 book Future Money (here)

====

A. Short formulation on AMI-Facebook

1) Incorporate the private Federal Reserve System into the U.S. Treasury.

2) Nationalize the currency and end the practice by banks to create bank credit money when originating loans.

3) Create an independent Monetary Authority which decides the amount of money in circulation and let the U.S. Congress decide how to spend its allowance of debt-free money.

Source: Schuller, Govert. 2017. “Regarding short accurate formulations of AMI’s monetary reform proposals”.   Facebook. 3 Oct 2017.

B. 32-Page AMI brochure “Presenting the American Monetary Act”

Monetary reform is achieved with three elements which must be enacted together for it to work. Any one or any two of them alone won’t do it, but could further harm the reform process. The reform has its best chance of passage in this severe monetary crisis created by the banking system using debt in place of money! Considering that the same establishment controls our weapons systems, this may be humanities only chance for reform, to stop the now obvious slide of our middle class into slavery or some form of “Disney Fascism.”

1). First, it incorporates the Federal Reserve System into the U.S. Treasury where all new money would be created by government as money, not interest-bearing debt; and be spent into circulation to promote the general welfare. A Monetary Authority monitors the money system to be neither inflationary nor deflationary.

2). Second, halt the bank’s privilege to create money by ending the fractional reserve system in a gentle and elegant way. All the past monetized bank credit would be converted into U.S. government money. Banks would then act as intermediaries accepting savings deposits and loaning them out to borrowers. They would do what people think they do now. This Act nationalizes the money system, not the banking system. Banking is not a proper function of government, but only government should provide the nation’s money supply!

3). Third, spend new money into circulation on 21st century eco-friendly infrastructure and energy sources, including the education and healthcare needed for a growing and improving society, starting with the $2.2 trillion that the Civil Engineers estimate is needed over the next 5 years, for infrastructure repair; creating good jobs across our nation, re-invigorating local economies and re-funding local government at all levels.

Source: Zarlenga, Stephen. 2011. “Presenting the American Monetary Act”. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

C. Dick Distelhorst’s Speech Template for Citizens Speaking to their City Councils and Civic Organizations

1). It incorporates the Federal Reserve into the U.S. Treasury where all money is created by the government as actual money, not interest-bearing debt, and is spent into circulation to promote the general welfare; monitored to be neither inflationary nor deflationary.

2). The Act eliminates Fractional Reserve Banking in a manner that would make the Federal Government the only entity with the power to create, issue and regulate our money, as Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution already mandates.

3). As the “debt-money” created by the privately owned Federal Reserve and commercial banks disappears as those debts are paid, it must be replaced with real money spent into circulation. This money will be used to rebuild our badly decayed public infrastructure, which includes roads, bridges, dams, water and sewage plants, mass transit, schools, etc. This will create millions of high paying jobs. Also included in Public infrastructure is universal health care and education for all. Also a stimulus check of at least $5,000 should be sent out to start getting us out of this recession by immediately putting money back in the hands of the American people.

Source: Distelhorst, Dick. 2011. “Dick Distelhorst’s Speech Template for Citizens Speaking to their City Councils and Civic Organizations”. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute. http://www.monetary.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/City-Council-Speech.pdf

D. Nick Egnatz’ Article “Linking Social Justice to Monetary Reform”

The NEED Act is a comprehensive monetary reform which was written by the Congressional Legislative Counsel as a non-partisan bill. Its three simple, but necessary, reforms are:

1). The Federal Reserve System is federalized. It becomes part of our government, exactly what most citizens mistakenly think it is now.

2). The banks’ ability to create what we use for money is decisively ended. The banks are not nationalized, but money creation is. In the future when banks make loans, they will be loaning money that already exists, not creating it. Exactly what most citizens mistakenly think they do now.

3). New US Money is created by our federal government and spent, not loaned, into existence, debt-free, for the needs of the nation and its people as determined by our elected, representative Congress. By charter the Monetary Commission, charged with determining how much money to create, will do so in a non inflation/deflationary manner.

Source: Egnatz, Nick. 2014. “Linking Social Justice to Monetary Reform”. Alpheus. 25 Dec 2014.

E. The “Greening of the Dollar” by the Green Party USA

1). Nationalize the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, reconstituting them and the Federal Reserve Systems Washington Board of Governors under a new Monetary Authority Board within the U.S. Treasury. The private creation of money or credit which substitutes for money, will cease and with it the reckless and fraudulent practices that have led to the present financial and economic crisis.

2). The Monetary Authority, with assistance from the FDIC, the SEC, the U.S. Treasury, the Congressional Budget Office, and others will redefine bank lending rules and procedures to end the privilege banks now have to create money when they extend their credit, by ending what’s known as the fractional reserve system in an elegant, non disruptive manner. Banks will be encouraged to continue as profit making companies, extending loans of real money at interest; acting as intermediaries be- tween those clients seeking a return on their savings and those clients ready and able to pay for borrowing the money; but banks will no longer be creators of what we are using for money.

3). The new money that must be regularly added to an improving system as population and commerce grow will be created and spent into circulation by the U. S. Government for infrastructure, including the “human infrastructure” of education and health care. This begins with the $2.2 trillion the American Society of Civil Engineers warns us is needed to bring existing infrastructure to safe levels over the next 5 years. Per capita guidelines will assure a fair distribution of such expenditures across the United States, creating good jobs, re-invigorating the local economies and re-funding government at all levels. As this money is paid out to various contractors, they in turn pay their suppliers and laborers who in turn pay for their living expenses and ultimately this money gets deposited into banks, which are then in a position to make loans of this money, according to the new regulations.

Source: Green Party US. 2014. “Monetary Reform (Greening the Dollar)”. July 2014.

F. As formulated by the Chicago Teachers Union

1). The NEED Act puts back the money creation power under public checks and balances thorough their Congressional representative

2). The NEED Act puts any necessary functions of the Federal reserve under public administrations to be in alignment with the U.S. Constitution

3). The NEED Act uses the money creation powers to give millions of people at all governmental levels work to improve the infrastructure of the country

Source: Chicago Teachers Union. 2012. ”Resolution to Support: The National Employment Emergency Defense (NEED) Act, H.R. 2990”. 9 Jan 2012.

G. As found on Bryan Witt’s site

1). Abolishing the privately owned FED and creating a new, non-partisan, Monetary Authority, within the U.S. Treasury

2). Nationalizing our currency by abolishing Federal Reserve Notes and creating interest-free United States Notes

[Note: Bryan Witt is a democrat running for congress in the 27th district of California]

Source: Witt, Bryan. 2017. “Witt for Progress”.

H. Covered in six points by Rev. Delman Coates

If we are to have just society, we must have a just monetary system; a money system that

1). provides for government issued, interest-free money,

2). takes banks out of the business of money creation and restricts banking to depositing savings, and lending actual savings;

3). separates investment banking from traditional banking;

4). eliminates the moral hazard of the public bailing out banks that engage in risky investment practices;

5). invests government issued money into public infrastructure (i.e. jobs, roads, health care, education, the environment, etc.); and

6). protects the right to vote and gets money out of politics.

[Note: Points 1, 2 and 5 would constitute the core of monetary reform. Missing is the fate of the FED]

Source: Coates, Delman. 2017. “ ‘The New Abolitionism’ – Monetary Reform and the Future of Social Justice”. PDF with footnotes at “The New Abolitionism: Symposium on Money Mechanics and a Moral Economy” Oct 2017.

I. As formulated by Robert Poteat

The NEED Act would:

1). terminate the power of private banks to create credit used as money;

2). restore the power to Congress to create and spend into circulation United States money debt and interest free to maintain a stable and productive economy without inflation or deflation; and

3). the present statistical data keeping, bank regulation, and institutional knowledge of the present system would be folded into the US Treasury as a new bureau.

[Note: Robert Poteat is the current director of the American Monetary Institute]

Source: Poteat, Robert. 2013. “A Viable Solution to the Economic Crisis”. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

J. As formulated on Ulrich Kortsch’s Real Money Economics web site

Real Money Economics is an economic theory which proposes to change the current monetary and fractional reserve banking system as follows:

1). change the bank depository and payment system to a “Trust Banking System”;

2). change the bank credit system to a mutual fund system;

3). to keep price stability, change the new money creation system from a deposit creation system as follows:

a) create a new entity owned by Treasury to be in charge of this, under the control of the Federal Reserve Bank, but not owned by it;

b) increase the money supply by a modified Taylor Rule

c) grant the resulting seigniorage to Treasury thus paying off the national debt and greatly lowering taxes.

[Note: This formulation is a bit technical, but still covers the same ideas]

Source: “Answers: Fixing The Banking System For Good“.

K. In “One Page Summary of What Hr 2990 Will Do”

The “NEED” Act HR 2990 solves the problem with 3 actions

1). The Federal Reserve is dismantled and good parts are placed into the US Treasury. A Monetary Authority is created which avoids an inflationary or deflationary money supply.

2). Accounting rule changes prohibit the banks from creating what we use for money- from using debt for money – what’s known as fractional reserve banking is decisively ended.

3). The Congress originates (creates) new US Money and spends it into circulation, for infrastructure, health care and education; starting for example with the $2.2 trillion the engineers tell us is needed for infrastructure over the next 5 years. Later the human infrastructure of health care and education is added. This is estimated to create over 7 million good jobs quickly.

[Note: HR2990 was the brain child of Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) with help from Stephen Zarlenga, founder of The American Monetary Institute, and many others]

Source: “HR2990”

L. In AMI’s “The Need for Monetary Reform”

Monetary reform is achieved with three elements which must be enacted together for it to work. Any one or any two of them alone won’t do it, but would further harm the reform process. The reform has its best chance of passage in this severe monetary crisis created by the privatized money system. Considering that the same establishment controls our weapons systems, this may be humanities only chance for reform, to stop the now obvious slide of our middle class into slavery or some form of “Disney Fascism.”

1). First, incorporate the Federal Reserve System into the U.S. Treasury where all new money would be created by government as money, not interest-bearing debt; and be spent into circulation to promote the general welfare. The monetary system would be monitored to be neither inflationary nor deflationary.

2). Second, halt the bank’s privilege to create money by ending the fractional reserve system in a gentle and elegant way. All the past monetized private credit would be converted into U.S. government money. Banks would then act as intermediaries accepting savings deposits and loaning them out to borrowers. They would do what people think they do now. This Act nationalizes the money system, not the banking system. Banking is not a proper function of government, but providing the nation’s money supply is a government prerogative!

3). Third, spend new money into circulation on 21st century eco-friendly infrastructure and energy sources, including the education and healthcare needed for a growing and improving society, starting with the $2.2 trillion that the Civil Engineers estimate is needed for infrastructure repair; creating good jobs across our nation, re-invigorating local economies and re-funding local government at all levels.

Source: Zarlenga, Stephen. 2009. “The Need for Monetary Reform“. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

M. In Dr. Lucille Eckrich’s  “Monetary Transformation and Education”

1) First, the NEED Act . . . disentangles the Federal Reserve System . . . and reincorporates the money-creation and -monitoring parts into the U.S. Treasury where all new money will be created as money (not by banks as interest-bearing debt lent into circulation, as currently happens) and spent into circulation to promote the general welfare and public good, its supply monitored overtime by the governmental monetary authority to be neither inflationary or deflationary.

2) Second, through its accounting rule changes, the NEED Act halts banks’ privilege to create money by ending the fractional reserve system (which is the legalized mechanism that allows banks currently to create what we use as money every time they make a loan) in a gentle and elegant way. All past monetized bank credit is converted into U.S. government money, as are treasury securities as they come due, and banks are held accountable for this conversion. . . .

3). Finally, through the NEED Act, the U.S. government creates (originates) all new U.S. money in accord with democratic budgetary processes of Congress and spends it into circulation as needed . . . to build postmodern public infrastructure, including for public education, healthcare, and $3 trillion for work that the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimates is needed over the next five years for infrastructure repair and development. . . .

Source: Eckrich, Lucille L. T. 2017. “Monetary Transformation and Public Education”. In Hartlep, Nicholas et al (Eds.). The Neoliberal Agenda and the Student Debt Crisis in US Higher Education. New York & London: Routledge, 233-250. 

N. In the “Manifesto” of the International Movement for Monetary Reform

1). All official money – be it cash, money-on-account or new forms of digital currency – is created by a monetary state authority such as the state-owned central bank, according to the needs of the economy in a transparent and accountable process.

2). Money is created free of debt, in that it is directly spent into the economy via the state by way of government expenditure or directly distributed to the citizens as an equal dividend.

3). Private banks can not create official money (national currencies) as credit. They only act as payment service providers and/or financial intermediaries by lending and investing already existing official money, which they obtain from savers and investors.

Source:  International Movement for Monetary Reform. “Manifesto“.

O. In Dr. Huber’s presentation “It’s a Banks’ World”

1). Full money monopoly

Extending the existing sovereign money monopolies on coins and banknotes to money on account, i.e. full nationalisation of the official and regular stock of money (in no way, however, nationalisation of banking).

2). Monetary authority

Conferring responsibility for the entire stock of money to an independent and impartial monetary authority, in Europe the central banks, or the ECB respectively.

3) . Phasing out bankmoney

A money reform today does with private bankmoney on account the same as was done with private banknotes in the 19th century: private banknotes were phased out and replaced with the central-bank monopoly on banknotes. Today, in an analogous way, it is about replacing bank money (demand deposits) with sovereign central-bank money.

Source: Huber, Jospeh. 2016. “It’s a Banks’ World: Functioning and dysfunctions of the present money system”. Presentation at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, 21 April 2016.

P. In Jacques Jaikaran’s  1992 book Debt Virus

Key Elements of the “Cure”

1.a). All existing laws and codes allowing money creation by private banks will be repealed.

1.b). Privater banks, institutions, and individuals will be prohibited from creating money.

2). The government will enact a law that the national Treasury will coin, create, provide, and regulate money and money credits for all the requirements of the nation, both public and private.

3). All money needed to meet national government obligations will be debt-free.

[Note: Quoting the three important elements of a nine-point ‘cure’.]

Source: Jaikaran, Jacques S. 1992. Debt Virus: A Compelling Solution to the World’s Debt Problems. Lakewood, CO: Glenbridge Publishing. Page 201.

Q. In the 2012 National Emergency Employment Defense Act

Section 2.(b). Purposes. (1), (3), (4), & (5):

1). To incorporate the Federal Reserve System into the Executive Branch under the United States Treasury, and to make other provisions for reorganization of the Federal Reserve System.

To create a Monetary Authority which shall pursue a monetary policy based on the governing principle that the supply of money in circulation should not become inflationary nor deflationary in and of itself, but will be sufficient to allow goods and services to move freely in trade in a balanced manner.

2). To abolish the creation of money, or purchasing power, by private persons through lending against deposits, by means of fractional reserve banking, or by any other means.

3). To enable the Federal Government to invest or lend new money into circulation as authorized by Congress and to provide means for public investment in capital infrastructure.

[Note: Titles I – III in the bill further anchor the three proposals]

Source:  H.R.2990 – National Emergency Employment Defense Act of 2011 (NEED Act). 112th US Congress (2011-2012).

R. In James Robertson’s  2012 book Future Money

Monetary reform: separating the two functions

A simple basic reform is all that is needed to separate the two functions now confused. It has two complementary parts.

(1) It will transfer to nationalised central banks like the Bank of England the responsibility for creating, not just banknotes and coins as now, but also the overwhelmingly large component of the supply of public money consisting of bank-account money mainly held and transmitted electronically.
Having created the money, the central bank will give it to the government to spend it into circulation on  public purposes under standard democratic budgetary procedures.

(2) It will prohibit anyone else, including commercial banks, from creating bank-account money out of thin air, just as forging metal coins and counterfeiting paper banknotes are criminal offences.

[Note: Robertson’s point (1) consists of two elements making his 2 points cover all three items of monetary reform]

Source: Robertson, James. 2012. Future Money: Breakdown or Breakthrough. Totnes, UK: Green Books.

A Viable Solution to the Economic Crisis

By Robert Poteat, Director, American Monetary Institute

The Problem: The 1913 Federal Reserve Act

Arguably the greatest attack on humanity in all of history was made December 23, 1913, the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act by the Congress and President of the United States. It was the culmination of centuries of political, financial, intellectual, and moral corruption. The corruption has only increased in the one hundred three year history of the Federal Reserve Banking System.

Stated purpose of the Act:

An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes.

The Act gave the power and privilege of creating the nation’s money supply to a private banking cartel, the Federal Reserve Banking System. That power is reserved and granted to the Congress of the United States by Article I, Section 8, Clause 5, of the United States Constitution. The Act did in fact establish Federal Reserve Banks. If “elastic currency” is a euphemism for inflation, the System has fulfilled that intention. Certainly, the System rediscounts commercial paper to the advantage of the monopoly System and disadvantage of the nation. Since the passage of the Act, there have been nineteen recessions, including two major depressions, showing banking supervision to be a tragic farce. Who knows the meaning of the vague phrase “other purposes?”

Subsequently, the Act was amended to also require the maintenance of employment. That, too, has become another item in the System’s catalogue of failures. The System’s failure is obscured by politically manipulated corruption of employment statistics.

The System creates the nation’s money supply by creating debt. The debt is euphemistically called credit. Either way, credit and debt is the same thing. It is done by bookkeeping trickery often referred to as fractional reserve deposit expansion. [1]

This power to issue debt used as money gives the private banking cartel power over the rest of society because it not only determines how much debt, used as money, is put into circulation and withdrawn; but, also, gives the cartel power to determine who gets money for what purpose. War is given preference over beneficial production, physical infrastructure, and human infrastructure such as education and healthcare.

The Act was passed just ahead of the United States entry into WWI. The war was

financed by bank credit creating the greatest increase in national debt to that time. Since then, the national debt has been exponentially expanded and used as power to concentrate wealth in private hands that control government, information sources, production, and education. Since WWII the economy of the United States has been co-opted for the purpose of nearly continuous war making. The war making is an attempt to gain monopoly control of the world’s resources for the most violent and brutal corporate empire the world has yet known.

The power to issue money was assigned to the Congress by the Constitution of the United States. Congress, and President Woodrow Wilson subverted democracy and justice when it passed that power to private interests. The System subverts peace, justice and democracy. It is the responsibility of the current Congress and President of the United States to address and correct the mistake Congresses and Presidents have made.

The Solution: The 2012 NEED Act

A viable correction has been offered; it was last introduced into the 112th Congress by former Congressman Dennis Kucinich as HR 2990, the National Emergency Employment Defense Act (the NEED Act ). [2] If passed, this bill could have refreshed and stabilized the U.S. economy, begun paying off the national debt, and made any level of physically possible and socially acceptable human culture available without national debt. The NEED Act would 1) terminate the power of private banks to create credit used as money; 2) restore the power to Congress to create and spend into circulation United States money debt and interest free to maintain a stable and productive economy without inflation or deflation; and 3) the present statistical data keeping, bank regulation, and institutional knowledge of the present system would be folded into the US Treasury as a new bureau. Private banks would retain the business privilege of acting as monetary intermediaries using their own money or money deposited with them by investors desiring that service. Uninformed people believe that this is the way banks operate now. 

Some provisions of the NEED Act are an immediate end to growth of national debt; fast investment in infrastructure to create millions of jobs; a tax free grant to all citizens to stimulate the economy; and begin paying off the national debt as it comes due to reduce interest burden on taxpayers. Environmental cleanup and energy needs can be met while creating jobs, too.

Another less visible public benefit of the NEED Act is that banks without the power to create credit would not be able to create the “bubble and crash” economy that has been so effective in robbing society to form the greatest concentration of wealth in the fewest hands in history, ever.

The United States has just experienced and incredibly corrupt election cycle of money, lies, voter fraud, media bias, personal attacks, and avoidance of substantive issues such as banking, war and resulting, legal, moral, and social disintegration. Much of the corruption was exposed by computer hacking without which it would not be known, except, perhaps, to historians fifty years in the future when irrelevant.

What would any election cycle be without catch-phrase promises like “drain the swamp,” clean up/out the corruption, and “make America great, again”? The NEED Act is the opportunity to make the promises real.

If the incoming administration spokesman and President elect intends to make good on his promises, a means to finance it is already written in legislative language. The aggressive promises, if carried out without monetary reform, could only mean huge increases in national debt, environmental destruction, stratification of wealth, and unstable economy; just more of the same.

A great opportunity is before the incoming administration.

Sources

[1]. Modern Money Mechanics: A Workbook on Bank Reserves and Deposit Expansion. 1992 (1961). The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. 

This publication is outdated since “reserves” no longer serve as a limitation of loan making, but it does confirm that loans are created by bookkeeping entries. The process is also confirmed by other Federal Reserve Bank publications and statements and a Bank of England report titled “Money Creation in the Modern Economy”.

McLeay, Michael & Radia, Amar & Thomas, Ryland. 2014. “Money Creation in the Modern Economy”. Monetary Analysis Directorate. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q1:14-27.

[2]. HR 2990 – National Emergency Employment Defense Act of 2011 (NEED Act). 112th Congress (2011-2012)

The American Monetary Institute is funded by public donation. Please support AMI with tax deductible contributions by check, credit card, direct deduction, or PayPal.

The American Monetary Institute is a 501c3 Charitable Trust founded in 1996 for independent research and publication of monetary history, theory, and science toward a moral and just monetary system.

Over time, whoever controls the money system controls the nation.

Stephen Zarlenga, founder (1941 – 2017)

American Monetary Institute, P, O, Box 601, Valatie, NY 12184

The New Abolitionism

The New Abolitionism – Monetary Reform and the Future of Social Justice

By Rev Delman Coates.

Introduction by Editor.

Rev. Delman Coates, Ph.D., is the Senior Pastor of the Mt. Ennon Baptist Church (Clinton, MD) and President of the Black Church Center for Justice & Equality. He is a monetary reform activist and embraces the logic underlying the 2012 NEED Act which was formulated and introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and was based on previous work on The American Monetary Act formulated by the late Stephen Zarlenga, founder and director of the American Monetary Institute.

Rev. Coates presents here the case that, if social and economic justice goals are to be attained, the current monetary system will first have to be thoroughly reformed based on studies done in especially the last five years by academics, central banks and knowledgeable journalists. His analysis leads to the main reform proposal in the last paragraph:

“If we are to have just society, we must have a just monetary system; a money system that (1) provides for government issued, interest-free money, (2) takes banks out of the business of money creation and restricts banking to depositing savings, and lending actual savings; (3) separates investment banking from traditional banking; (4) eliminates the moral hazard of the public bailing out banks that engage in risky investment practices; (5) invests government issued money into public infrastructure (i.e. jobs, roads, health care, education, the environment, etc.); and (6) protects the right to vote and gets money out of politics.”

The New Abolitionism – Monetary Reform and the Future of Social Justice (PDF)

Stephen Zarlenga – Wiki Entry

Stephen Zarlenga (1941-2017) was a researcher and author in the field of monetary history, theory and reform. Italian philosopher Giorgio Baruchello called him a “maverick intellectual”.[1]

In 1976 Zarlenga served on the board of the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) of Great Barrington, Massachusetts.[2] In 1996 he co-founded the non-profit charitable trust The American Monetary Institute for the “independent study of monetary history, theory and reform”.[3]

In 2002 he published his 700-page study The Lost Science of Money: The Mythology of Money – The Story of Power, which study, according to professor Dwight Murphy, was “an extended review of world monetary history”[4], and according to German Economist Dr. Michael Kumhof was “a masterful work”.[5]

He encapsulated his research in one perceptive phrase: “Over time, whoever controls the money system, controls the nation”.[6]

In 2004 Stephen organized the first AMI Monetary Reform Conference, which became a yearly event in which many academic experts, community activists and otherwise interested persons participated.

He was also instrumental in formulating and promoting monetary reform legislation for the US Congress to adopt. Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich from Ohio introduced in 2010 the National Employment Emergency Defense Act (NEED Act), which was based on an earlier version developed by Zarlenga, the American Monetary Act.[7]

Bibliography

Zarlenga, Stephen. 2000. ”A Brief History of Interest”. AMI Paper, 3. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2002. The Lost Science of Money. The Mythology of Money – the Story of Power. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2002. “Critique of Innes’ ‘Credit Theory of Money’ ”. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2005. “Moving Monetary Reform to the ‘Front Burner’”. American Review of Political Economy, Vol 3, No. 1 (March 2005): 39-84.

———-. 2005. “The 1930s Chicago Plan and the 2005 American Monetary Act”. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2006. “Is the Federal Reserve System a Governmental or a Privately Controlled Organization?.” Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2010. “Refutation of Menger’s Theory of the Origin of Money“. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute.

———-. 2013. “Sequesters, Shutdowns And Defaults”. Huffington Post. The Blog. 11 Oct 2013.

———- & Poteat, Robert. 2016. “The Nature of Money in Modern Economy –Implications and Consequences”. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 29/2 (July 2016): 57-73.

References

[1]. Baruchello, Giorgio. 2013. “Review essay” of Economists and the Powerful: Convenient Theories, Distorted Facts, Ample Rewards. Häring, Norbert, & Douglas, Niall, London: Anthem Press, 2012.  Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 8/2: 216-225.

[2]. Stephen Zarlenga, Director, American Monetary Institute. Huffington Post.

[3]. American Monetary Institute.

[4]. Murphey, Dwight D. 2011. “Capitalism’s Deepening Crisis: The Imperative of Monetary Reconstruction.” The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 36/3: 283.

[5]. Kumhof, Michael & Benes, Jaromir. 2012. “The Chicago Plan Revisited.” IMF Working Papers 12/202, International Monetary Fund. 

[6]. American Monetary Institute.

[7]. H.R.2990 – National Emergency Employment Defense Act of 2011 (NEED Act). 112th Congress (2011-2012). 

On Trump: The Tasaroff Doctrine Trumps the Goldwater Rule

 

For those who are concerned about the appropriateness of using psychiatric diagnostic tools to assess the mental fitness and dangerousness of President Trump the following:

It apparently is totally legitimate, even legally required, for mental health professionals to warn targeted people and society at large for the dangers a troubled person or group of persons might exhibit in their words, actions and plans. Such a warning is not a psychiatric diagnosis and therefore does not break the APA’s Goldwater Rule [1] against professionals making a distant diagnosis of a public figure. A very important footnote to the introduction of the recently published anthology “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump” [2] reads as follows:

“Assessing dangerousness requires a different standard from diagnosing so as to formulate a course of treatment. Dangerousness is about the situation, not the individual; it is more about the effects and the degree of impairment than on the specific cause of illness and it does not require a full examination but takes into account whatever information is available. Also, it requires that the qualified professional err on the side of safety, and it may entail breaking other, ordinarily binding rules to favor urgent action.”[3]

The legal duty to warn others was initially encoded in an influential court case and is known as the Tarasoff Doctrine.[4] The plaintiffs in the case were the parents of a murdered female student who found out that the murderer, who was a fellow student and her ex-boyfriend, had confessed to his therapist that he intended to kill her. The parents sued the university for having failed to warn her of the possible danger she might have been in. “The court ruled that when a therapist determines, or should have determined, that a patient presents a serious danger of violence to another, the therapist has a “duty to protect” that other person.”[5]

Though some mental health professionals have deliberately decided to break the Goldwater Rule and make very precise statements about Trump’s mental health, many others abide by the rule but still feel compelled by the Tasaroff Doctrine to sound the alarm loud and clearly and warn the world that Trump is truly a danger to minorities, domestic peace and and is too close to the nuclear button, which he might push when cornered by his critics, political opponents or the legal system.

For the sake of the civilizational process and project and for the sake of the good fight against authoritarian conservatism bordering on an American variation of fascism, mental health professionals and other academics will have to share their insights with the public, and not merely to inform them but more importantly to increase the pressure on the political system to take care of this problem by either impeachment, invoking Article 25 or outright institutionalization. Their insights might also lead to diminishing the amount of people strangely mesmerized by the self-aggrandizing serial liar now occupying the White House.

Originally posted on Facebook, October 27, 2017.

[1]. A. The Goldwater Rule. B. “On Trump: Diagnosing 301.81 and the Goldwater Rule“. Alpheus. 21 Feb 2017.

[2]. Lee, Bandy, M.D. (Ed.). 2017. “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President“. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

[3]. Lee, Bandy. 2017. “Introduction” to “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump”, p. 14.

[4]. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.

[5]. Simone, Simone & Fulero, Solomon M., PhD, JD. 2005. “Tarasoff and the Duty to Protect”. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, Vol. 11 / Issues 1-2.

In Memory of Stephen Zarlenga

Dear friends of the monetary reform cause,

Last April 25 Stephen Zarlenga, the founder and director of the American Monetary Institute,  passed away at his residence in Palatine, Illinois. He was cremated in a private ceremony at Elegy Cremation and Memorial Services, Arlington Heights, Illinois. His friends are organizing a memorial event, details of which are not yet known.

Stephen, a native of Chicago where he was born in 1941, was an insightful researcher of the history and mechanism of money and banking and he was a tireless crusader for monetary reform. In 1996 he established the non-profit charitable trust The American Monetary Institute and in 2002 he published his 700-page study The Lost Science of Money: The Mythology of Money – The Story of Power, which will have to be ranked as one of the classics in its field.

He encapsulated his research in one perceptive phrase: “Over time, whoever controls the money system, controls the nation”.

In 2004 Stephen organized the first AMI Monetary Reform Conference, which became a yearly successful event in which many academic experts, community activists and otherwise interested persons participated. The 13th Annual Conference is slated to be held at the University Center of the Roosevelt University in Chicago on September 14 through 17.

He was also instrumental in formulating and promoting monetary reform legislation for the US Congress to adopt. Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich from Ohio introduced in 2010 the National Employment Emergency Defense Act (Need Act), which was based on an earlier version developed by Stephen, the American Monetary Act.

With Stephen’s passing the American monetary reform movement lost its most prominent and influential member and he will be sorely missed. Some big shoes are to be filled because his cause is our cause and should be humanity’s concern, because we believe that well-thought-out monetary reform legislation can have profound transformative effects on our globalized world as it can democratically redirect the power of money creation towards the formation of a more just and equitable society.

If you like you can sign his memorial guest book here. 

On Trump: Towards An Understanding Of Why Republicans Have Switched Off Their Critical Faculties

 

At the average rate of 4.88 lies a day [1] the current US president during his first 100 days in office has disgraced his office and further besmirched the international reputation of the US. Lie by lie he has walled himself in and lost credibility in the eyes of most sane and rational people. The disturbing and for many people mysterious phenomenon is that Trump’s job approval rating amongst Republicans is still at 87%.[2] This little article might provide some crucial pieces of this puzzle.

One study of the rise of malevolent political groups observed that when “a group [in this case the GOP] has succumbed to pathological influence [Trump and his clique] its members soon lose the ability to distinguish normal human behavior from pathological.”[3]

I think a strong case can be made that most Republicans have been hoodwinked and spellbound by Trumpism and that their increasing lack of critical thinking is being compensated with becoming more emotional and confused and that they increasingly, like their leader, perceive non-existent conspiracies and dangers.[4]

A very similar analysis was recently provided by the CEO of The New York Times, Mark Thompson, who gave an analysis of Trump’s use and abuse of the English language.

The super-short sentences emphasize certainty and determination, build up layer upon layer, like bricks in a wall themselves, toward a conclusion and an emotional climax. It’s a style that students of rhetoric call parataxis. This is the way generals and dictators have always spoken to distinguish themselves from the caviling civilians they mean to sweep aside. . . Trump’s appeal as a presidential candidate depends significantly on the belief that he is a truth-teller who will have nothing to do with the conventional language of politics. . . . We shouldn’t confuse anti-rhetorical ‘truth telling’ with actually telling the truth. One of the advantages of this positioning is that once listeners are convinced that you’re not trying to deceive them in the manner of a regular politician, they may switch off the critical faculties they usually apply to political speech and forgive you any amount of exaggeration, contradiction, or offensiveness. And if establishment rivals or the media criticize you, your supporters may dismiss that as spin.”[5]

If you tie the above ideas with the analysis by political scientist Karen Stenner on the increased intolerance of authoritarian conservatives based on their perception of real and imagined threats [6], you can get a more fine-grained understanding of what is really going on with the conservative part of the US electorate in relation to the truth.

Originally posted on Facebook, May 2, 2017.

[1]. “President Trump’s first 100 days: The fact check tally“. The Washington Post. 1 May 2017. 

[2]. “Presidential Approval Ratings — Donald Trump“. Gallup. 

[3]. “The Genesis of Evil“. Political Ponerology Web Site. 

[4]. “Trump: The Aspiring Pathocrat“. Alpheus. 24 Feb 2017. 

[5]. Blow, Charles. “Trump’s Degradation of the Language“. 1 May 2017. The New York Times. 

[6]. “On Trump: Intolerance and Authoritarianism“. Alpheus. 20 Feb 2017. 

Trump and the Deep State / The Koch Brothers’ New Brand

 

Just read new and updated forewords to two important book-length studies about power in the US. Both were updated to put their considerable investigations in connection with the new Trump administration.

The first book is by Prof. Peter Dale Scott, co-founder of the Peace and Conflict Studies program at UC Berkeley. He wrote a new foreword–“Donald J. Trump and The Deep State”[1]–to the recent 2017 paperback version of his The American Deep State: Big Money, Big Oil, and the Struggle for U.S. Democracy (2014)[2]. He is an expert on the concept of ‘Deep State’ and provides an updated history of the concept’s development.

Entry to the next massive study can be best obtained by reading ecological activist Bill McKibben’s review–“The Koch Brothers’ New Brand”[3]–to Jane Mayer’s Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right.[4] On Amazon you can read most of her new foreword.

What becomes clear in these writings is the fact that Trump and his cabinet are very much integral elements of the American power elite, though are part of a nationalist faction which has always operated at the margins of government.

Originally posted on Facebook, Feb 10, 2017.

[1]. Scott, Peter Dale. “Donald J. Trump and The Deep State“. Who.What.Why. 6 Feb 2017.

[2]. Scott, Peter Dale. The American Deep State: Big Money, Big Oil, and the Struggle for U.S. Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. 

[3]. McKibben, Bill. “The Koch Brothers’ New Brand”. New York Review of Books. 10 Mar 2016. 

[4]. Mayer, Jane. Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Doubleday, 2016.

On Trump: Against Normalization: The Lesson of the “Munich Post” by Ron Rosenbaum

 

I consider Ron Rosenbaum as one of America’s best and most entertaining journalistic writers. For me memorable articles include the ones on Watergate, the CIA mole-hunt and a few articles about Yale’s semi-secret senior society Skull and Bones.[1]

He also wrote a fascinating study, Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil, about the many serious but diverse theories trying to get a grip on this most disturbing dictator.[2] Because of this expertise he was apparently asked many times to weigh in on the Trump-Hitler comparison debate, which he resisted till just after the inauguration.

Now Trump and his minions are in the driver’s seat, attempting to pose as respectable participants in American politics, when their views come out of a playbook written in German. Now is the time for a much closer inspection of the tactics and strategy that brought off this spectacular distortion of American values.[3]

Besides being vintage Rosenbaum, the article will be of interest for journalists as it focuses on the fate of a German opposition newspaper which was forced to stop its presses in early 1933 just after Hitler became chancellor.

And I remembered the Munich Post, defending Weimar Germany. I reflected on how fragile democratic institutions could be in the face of organized hatred. Hitler had been tricky about his plans until he got the position and the power to enact them. Trump had been tricky, neither accepting nor rejecting the endorsement of KKK leader David Duke. David Duke! The KKK! In this century! He claimed he didn’t know who he was. He couldn’t be disqualified because of someone he didn’t know. That’s where we all went wrong, thinking he was stupid and outrageous, not canny and savvy and able to play the media like Paganini. The election demonstrated the weakness of a weak democracy, where basic liberties could be abolished by demagoguery and voter suppression.

Originally posted on Facebook, February 20, 2107.

[1]. Articles collected in: Rosenbaum, Ron. Travels With Dr. Death: And other Unusual Investigations (New York: Penguin, 1991) and The Secret Parts of Fortune: Three Decades of Intensive Investigations and Edgy Enthusiasms (New York: Random House, 2000).

[2]. Rosenbaum, Ron. Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil. (New York: Random House, 1998).

[3]. Rosenbaum, Ron. “Against Normalization: The Lesson of the ‘Munich Post’ “.  Los Angeles Review of Books. Feb 2017.

On Trump: “Trump’s New World Order”

It is interesting to see how delusional and divided the far right is in the US.

First of all I consider the far right that faction of the conservative movement which is authoritarian. This is the faction composed of people who have become intolerant of certain social and cultural differences and tend to exaggerate dangers, both real and imagined. Many found in Donald Trump their strong man to restore law and order, kick out the illegals, protect the homeland and get the jobs back from parasitic foreign countries.[1]

These authoritarian conservatives are not the same as the moderate status quo conservatives who have been quite outspoken against Trump during the primaries, then became somewhat supportive or silent during the election, and now some of whom have regained their oppositional voice like Senator McCain. The other conservative faction is the libertarian one. Overall they were opposed to Trump as he did not seem to understand the US Constitution nor the libertarian concept of freedom. Libertarian Senator Rand Paul recently made an inside quip about the Trump cabinet: “Haven’t seen this many billionaires since I staked out Bilderbergs with Alex Jones”.[2] Both factions lost adherents to the authoritarian Trump as conservatives succumbed to his mendacious fear-mongering and empty boasts to set things straight again.

Besides moderate and libertarian conservative opposition to Trump it looks like that within the far right itself there are some recent voices expressing second thoughts about him. For example Aaron and Melissa Dykes, who used to work for the arch-conspiricist and ardent Trump supporter Alex Jones, created a video attacking Trump from the farther right as a tool of hidden forces which, through Trump’s cabinet picks, are promoting a ‘New World Order’, which “started under Bush, was continued by Obama, and now it has been exponentially ramped up by Trump”,  especially by his national security team. Trump might not be totally aware of that and for support the Dykes repeat the now well-known quote by Steve Bannon that Trump  is a “blunt instrument for us. I don’t know whether he really gets it or not.”[3]

The whole video is a sample of sloppy conspiricist thinking at its best. They pick up facts and perspectives which might by themselves be worthy of deeper investigation (even the conclusion has merit, see below), but then fit them in a far-fetched narrative in which, for example, Hillary Clinton played the willing role of a “villain”, making intentionally stupid mistakes like her “deplorables” comment to make Trump look more heroic in this “stage play that was our last election”.

The interesting aspect for me here is that the Dykes do come to a conclusion in their video which has certain merits and that is that it has some congruence with more thoughtful criticisms of both Trump and Clinton coming from the progressive and socialist left. All of them agree that Bush, Romney, Obama, Clinton and Trump are all part of an establishment which is shaped and driven by deeper political and economic forces which they hardly challenge or, if challenged, only do so verbally. Many politicians, social scientists, journalists and whistleblowers have seen different smaller and bigger parts of this complex and have given it different names like the military-industrial complex, the power elite, the oligarchy, the Deep State, etc. Nobody really knows how this complex functions and perpetuates itself, but I think it is far more fractious, diverse and improvisational than most conspiricists believe, especially the grand conspiricists who think all politics and history is one big theater enacting an already determined script like the Dykes seem to believe in.

Meanwhile one can move even further to the right and enter the anti-Semitic corner from which Alex Jones and the Dykes are criticized for covering up the Jewish component of the international power elite and therefore running “Kosher Approved Fake ‘Truth’ Sites” peddling in fantasies, phony narratives and implausible conspiracies.[4]

A more personal reason to bring this video into focus has to do with the criticism I received from long-time friends and acquaintances for my opposition to Trump as they assumed that I, as a (former) conspiracy theorist of very limited reputation, should have seen the great and unprecedented opportunity of Trump taking on ‘The Conspiracy’ and maybe delivering it a knock out blow. Some might not have known that I had shifted from a spiritualist libertarianism to an evolutionist progressivism, which transformed conspiricism into a more scientific critique of power relations. Nevertheless, even if I had abided with conspiricism, I would have seen early on that Trump was not a bona fide conspiracy theorist and that he was quite ignorant, except for his own real estate lobbying sphere, about the structure, composition and practices of exploitation and domination of the current US power elite. Trying to pass off  Richard Haass, the president of the most internationalist and influential corporate elite think thank The Council on Foreign Relations–reviled by both the far left and far right–, as your favorite foreign policy advisor is an almost one-strike-out faux pas only a political novice could make. And by letting Bilderberg Steering Committee member and CIA-connected Peter Thiel on your transition team and then hire Skull & Bones (1985) member and foreclosure king Steven Mnuchin as treasury secretary you have already lost the game. Right wing conspiricist Glenn Beck–rooted in the works of whistleblower historian Carroll Quigley, former FBI agent W. Cleon Skousen and nephew Joel Skousen–saw also quickly Trump’s danger and called him a “narcissistic psychopath”, though he later turned around and supported Trump.

In short, I do share with conspiricists concerns about power and secrecy, but will investigate those phenomena guided by scientific principles rather than revelation, ideology, axiomatic conspiricism or wishful thinking.

As far as the video is concerned, I hope it will wake up conspiricist Trump supporters who then might consider to enter a temporary coalition with moderate conservatives and liberals to deal with the present and acute danger Trump poses through impeachment.

Originally posted on Facebook, February 18,  2017.

[1]. Schuller, Govert. “On Trump: Intolerance and Authoritarianism“. Alpheus. 20 Feb 2017. [Warning: Alpheus is an independent, critical website]

[2]. Watson, Steve. “Rand Paul Is Unhappy About Trump’s ‘Bilderberg’ Cabinet“. Infowars. 23 Dec 2016. [Warning: Infowars is a right wing, conspiricist fake news website]

[3]. Dykes, Aaron and Melissa. “Trump’s New World Order“. Truthstream Media. 5 Feb 2017. [Warning: Truthstream Media is a right wing, conspiricist website]

[4]. Rogers, Lee. “An Expose on Other Alex Jones-Style Kosher Approved Fake “Truth” Sites“. The Daily Slave. 28 Oct 2014. Reposted on The Daily Stormer.   [Warning: The Daily Slave and The Daily Stormer are right wing, conspiricist websites]